10x Strategy Meeting
Incremental planning usually starts from the current operating model. A 10x session temporarily removes that constraint, separates idea generation from feasibility review, and routes every captured idea to a next decision, owner, and date.
When feasibility questions enter the opening minutes, the group narrows ideas to what it already knows how to staff and build. Separate generation from challenge so the room evaluates scale only after alternatives are captured.
Use groups of three: an Idea Generator, a Challenger, and a Note Taker. The output is not a plan. It is a record of the ideas, why each matters, and who owns the next decision.
An idea nobody wrote the why for does not survive the week.
THE FRAMING BLOCK names a droppable assumption
Ten percent looks like: one more van, a wider service radius
Tenfold would have to be: ten times the customers served
Drop the assumption that: growth means more of the same work
THREE ROLES PER GROUP, and the group is three people
Idea Generator proposes; does not self-censor for feasibility
Challenger asks what would have to be true, never that
will not work; silent until the challenge block
Note Taker records the why alongside the what
A remainder is split visibly, e.g. 11 people, two groups of 4 and
one group of 3, with the groups of 4 carrying two Idea Generators.
No group is left without a Note Taker; if one is, the packet says
Note Taker needed before the session starts.THE FIVE BLOCKS, scaled to the slot you actually have 1. Framing and rules 10x not 10 percent, why-not-how 2. Group ideation groups work the starter questions 3. Present back the what and the why, any medium 4. Challenge and build feasibility and scale, building 5. Capture and route consolidate; owner names next step Block minutes are fractions of the slot supplied, and they sum to it. No canonical session length is ever asserted. PRESENT BACK ACCEPTS ANY MEDIUM: text, a sketch, a diagram, or role play. Judge the idea and its rationale, not the polish of the medium. Rewrite the seven starter questions in the room's product, market, and customer terms so participants can answer with relevant evidence.
FIVE FIELDS PER IDEA, and the labels are the honest ones
What the idea as the group presented it
Why the case for it, or Not recorded
Discussion points what was raised, or None noted
Scale check per the room, or Not discussed
Data check data named, or Data needed
A BARE WHAT STAYS A BARE WHAT
Notes say: "partner with home builders?? something about
install day. rest of the page is missing"
Captured as:
What: a partnership with home builders, tied to install day
Why: Not recorded
Discussion points: source notes end here; no further detail recorded
TEN PERCENT CREEP IS LABELED, never dropped and never dressed up.
An idea that optimizes the existing funnel is kept and marked
incremental. It may be a good idea in a different meeting.THE ROUTING TABLE closes the session | Idea | Next step | Owner | By when | Every row is filled. Where the notes named nobody: Owner needed not a plausible name from the room Date needed not a guessed quarter WHAT THIS SKILL HANDS OFF, by slug business-goals measurable goals how-to-plan-new-product-and-services a phased plan prioritization-formula scoring and ranking The reply is the artifact and nothing else. It begins at the capture title line and ends at the routing table's final row: no preamble, no closing summary, no count of the gaps it labeled. In-place labels are part of the artifact and stay.
10x-strategy-meeting/
├── SKILL.md ← the two modes + the delivery boundary
├── meta.yaml ← version, sources, test prompts, changelog
├── LICENSE.md ← MIT
├── assets/
│ ├── capture-template.md ← one entry per idea + the routing table
│ └── session-packet-template.md ← the packet the owner sends to the room
└── references/
└── facilitation-notes.md ← roles, why-not-how, failure modes"Use the 10x-strategy-meeting skill to prep a 10x strategy session for my team."